
Sometimes it is difficult to explain why I hate Joe Morgan (the broadcaster) so much. People ask me all the time when I'm wearing the above shirt, and I generally reply that if they have to ask, I'm not really going to be able to explain it particularly well. Which is a total cop out of an answer. So let me try to explain at least why I, in particular, cannot stand him.
Generally, when a person holds an outright incorrect view of reality, they are punished for it. If I think that I am the best poker player at the table and I am in fact the worst, barring some extremely fortunate flops, I will lose all my money. If I think the statute of limitations on a claim is 1 year but is in fact 6 months, I'll probably be sued for malpractice. If I am stranded on a lifeboat and I believe that salt-water will in fact quench my thirst, I will die that much quicker.
This is really the key to the character that is Joe Morgan. More often than not he is demonstrably wrong in what he disseminates to the public as "expert" baseball knowledge. Lets put aside the relative merits of sabermetric baseball analysis (although this is a man who stated that "you can't compare things with statistics.") This is someone who totally made up a story about how he was critical to the Phillies collapse of 1964. This is someone, who in this past Sunday's broadcast of the Tigers / Angels game, stated that Justin Verlander (the starting pitcher for the Tigers) struck out Curtis Granderson (the leadoff hitter for the Tigers) with a curveball.
Two things wrong with that.
1) You can't strike out your own team's leadoff hitter.
2) If he was referring to Verlander striking out Chone Figgins, the leadoff hitter of the Angels, it was with a 97 mph fastball. The strikeout on a curveball came against Vladimir Guerrero. This occurred in the first inning of the game.
Now you may say I'm nitpicking, but this stuff happens almost every time he speaks. He even got into a story later in the broadcast where he directly contradicted himself at least twice. He was talking about hitting in front of Johnny Bench, and how if he got on he would give Bench a couple pitches to hit before trying to steal second. He then ended his anecdote with something like, "Because Johnny knew that I would be gone by the second pitch." It was thoroughly confusing and Jon Miller had nothing to say at that point. I guess he's just used to it.
So there are plenty of bad broadcasters out there. Why focus on Morgan? First, because he's the most prominent. And second, because he is consistently rewarded for his idiocy! He was voted into the Baseball Hall of Fame as a broadcaster and also has won an Emmy. HOW????
When you are consistently wrong, how can you be rewarded? It is as if the normal laws of causality do not apply to him. Instead of losing all his money, he is given lucrative contracts. Instead of being fired for incompetence, he is praised as brilliant. And instead of having his broadcasting career cut short with every moronic word or phase uttered out of his mouth, it is instead given that much more longevity by the fools who eat it up. This is what makes the whole situation infuriating.
The best analogy may be to the Simpsons episode entitled "Homer's Enemy." In that episode, Frank Grimes gets a job at the nuclear power plant, and he is amazed at how Homer has a job. He becomes infuriated to see that Homer's incompetence is overlooked by his coworkers, boss, and the rest of Springfield. Eventually, Grimes goes crazy and ends up killing himself while trying to imitate Homer.
Hmm, thats not a good ending for me.









